Orbs --- what a controversy

I would just like to say that I have read many articles on "orbs" and what they may be.

Most articles say they are caused by dust particles or light refraction.

Surely people dont want to have a sea of orbs when they take pictures like the ones I took below on a brand new camera.
We have got red eye removal on cameras so why not orb removal if they are dust etc.





I know that whenever I feel Spirit presence, I capture orbs on camera.
My home is very dusty, but I very rarely capture orbs when taking pictures in here with the same camera.

They can say what they like -- Im sticking to my guns --- orbs are spirit before they manifest themselves.

What is your opinion?

Thanks
Claire

claire@white-light-investigations.com
www.white-light-investigations.com

I cant agree with you on this one Clairy.
When I was filming for a new paranormal tv show here in Halifax I was given the opportunity to work with a DVR system. When this was turned on be it low light or in the dark you would not believe the amount of debris could be seen in the air, it was a constant flow of orbs.
Its amazing what the naked eye cant see moving in the air.
For that reason, I don't believe the majority of orb pictures to be paranormal.

Now on the other hand, if the orb picture was extraordinary. If it was caught moving with a trail of light behind it, or if it was bright instead of translucent with no other explanation (lens flair) I would want a second opinion and possibly throw it into the paranormal pile.

HauntedHRM wrote:Now on the other hand, if the orb picture was extraordinary. If it was caught moving with a trail of light behind it, or if it was bright instead of translucent with no other explanation (lens flair) I would want a second opinion and possibly throw it into the paranormal pile.

I am in agreement with this as well. There are many photo's i have seen with orbs in them but only a few i could say that's were genuine.